Music Industry Leaders Challenge UK's AI Copyright Training Plan
Major label executives and indie sector leaders are strongly opposing a UK government proposal that would allow AI companies to train their models on copyrighted works without explicit permission from rightsholders.
London cityscape at sunset
Universal Music's Lucian Grainge, Sony Music's Rob Stringer, and Warner Music's Robert Kyncl have voiced serious concerns about the controversial framework, which would implement an opt-out system for copyright holders rather than requiring explicit permission for AI training.
The proposal aims to attract AI investment to the UK amid strict EU regulations. However, industry leaders argue this approach would severely compromise intellectual property rights and music monetization opportunities.
Key opposition points:
- Grainge states the UK is at a "decisive crossroads" regarding IP protection
- Kyncl warns the proposal would be "very detrimental" to the music industry
- Stringer emphasizes creators must be fairly compensated for AI use of their work
- AIM CEO Gee Davy argues the exception would create a "race to the bottom"
Industry leaders propose instead:
- Automatic training safeguards for creators
- Amendments to the UK's Data Bill to strengthen copyright protections
- Creation of mutual growth frameworks between AI developers and the music industry
The campaign has gained support from prominent artists including Paul McCartney and Elton John, along with various organizations and lawmakers. Meanwhile, similar AI copyright challenges continue to develop in the United States, particularly regarding fair use definitions and AI training regulations.
Biggie Smalls street art mural
Related Articles
Jimmy Page Slams UK's AI Music Proposal, Calls It 'Exploitation Without Consequence'
